Bum wrote:Been meaning to give Brambling Cross a run. Be sure to let us know how this one works out.
matr wrote:Are you sure the yeast will be ok drs? I've heard some "expert" advise about using top cropped yeasts..
drsmurto wrote:I've used it a few times now in single hop bitters but decided to combine it with challenger which i am a huge fan of. Get your hands on a bottle of Ruddles County - Bramling Cross is the flavour/aroma hop in that.
Bum wrote:drsmurto wrote:I've used it a few times now in single hop bitters but decided to combine it with challenger which i am a huge fan of. Get your hands on a bottle of Ruddles County - Bramling Cross is the flavour/aroma hop in that.
I'll keep any eye out for it. Wanting to give the hop a go either way but unsure as how to build a beer it'd work in. Hence my question about your recipe in general. I'm not sure of my grain bill is what I guess I am trying to get at. Excluding one IPA, I'm yet to put down a proper English style so I'm slightly lost.
I have been reading a lot of recipes, naturally, so I'm not after a crash course or anything like that. I do have a rough idea about how they're supposed to be built but I can't taste these beers in my mind when I look at the recipes like I sorta of can with APAs etc. Does that make any sense?
rotten wrote:I just brewed my first AG drsmurto golden ale. Whole kit & kaboodle this time. Got pics and info so will start a thread soon.
Cheers.
drsmurto wrote:Bum - i notice a lot of brewers do this and it confuses me. Carapils adds body, dex lightens the body. So why add both? Why not use the mash temp and time to adjust the fermentability of the wort and subsequent body of the beer?
Bum wrote:drsmurto wrote:Bum - i notice a lot of brewers do this and it confuses me. Carapils adds body, dex lightens the body. So why add both? Why not use the mash temp and time to adjust the fermentability of the wort and subsequent body of the beer?
Like I said - I am working from a recipe designed by the bloke who brews the commercial beer in question so the decision was not mine. It hurt a little to be honest - this is only the second time I've used dex for anything other than priming and the first was for a kit cider some time ago.
As for the carapils, I'm not sure why many brewers suggest all it does is add body. Have a chew of some (like I did on brew day with this point in mind) - tastes much sweeter and a little bready in comparison to the pale malt we'll all throw kilos of at a beer and not question its worth. Carapils adds flavour while it adds body - that flavour isn't earthshattering but to deny its existence is kinda pointless. And as for "why add both?" I guess it'd be too thick or thin without one or the other. You can't just omit both and add base malt until you get the same OG and get the same flavour beer.
Personally, it is my preference to omit dex from my brewing and while I have nothing against carapils as such I will always choose a spec grain with a little more depth to it but I usually like my beers slightly busy. If this beer turns out well I'll probably redo it with the carapils subbed for something I've never used and see how it goes from there. Cararye maybe?
drsmurto wrote:You can't compare base malt and crystal malts, they are 2 very different things with very different processes used to achieve the end result.
drsmurto wrote:Anyway, have fun with the Pliny. I had a few bottles of a clone brewed by BYB from AHB. One of the hoppiest beers i have tasted. Could still taste it the next day!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests