Simple things that make HB better

General homebrew discussion, tips and help on kit and malt extract brewing, and talk about equipment. Queries on sourcing supplies and equipment should go in The Store.

Postby JaCk_SpArRoW » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:05 pm

Aussie Claret wrote:BE2 which is a brew booster and a mix of LDME, Maltodextrine and dextrose.
Have you used this particular product AC?....and if so, what were the results opposed to using your own mix of malt etc?
:twisted: Ćĥĕĕŕś Ň ÃƒÅ¸ĕĕŕś :twisted:
~Ĵ@©ķ~
"Ah that's just drunk talk, sweet beautiful drunk talk" - Homer
http://blackpearlbrewingco.blogspot.com/
JaCk_SpArRoW
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wednesday Jan 04, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Canberra

Postby Aussie Claret » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:11 pm

Hi,
I often use BE2, depending on the style of beer I'm making. Although I usually add a little more LDME upto 500g and hops; in the last few lagers which came out well balanced. I have used BE2 on it's own and was pleased with the results (one in a coopers Canadian Blonde).

In my LCPA I added 1.5kgs Coopers LME + 500 dextrose and a lot of hops 36g. It took quite a while to balance and was initially sweet (from the malt) with an after bitterness from the hops.

Really it's all about personal taste, I wouldn't add more than 1.5Kgs of malt to any of my beers unless I was after a very rich Ale.

Hope this helps.
AC
There's nothing wrong with having nothing to say - unless you insist on saying it. (Anonymous)
Aussie Claret
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Thursday Sep 01, 2005 11:55 am
Location: Gold Coast

Postby scblack » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:13 pm

Aussie Claret wrote: If you are after a beer that's a bit drier then you could always add some honey. :wink: Ask DD
Cheers
AC

Or, he could try Dry Enzyme. I put a question up about this recently, and some HATE using it, some ambivalent. It apparently increases the beer's using up of fermentables, creating a drier flavour (slightly higher alcohol content too).

But I have not yet tried the one brew I have done with it yet. But if you like drier brews, Carbonator, it may be something to try.

and here's the link to that thread:
http://www.homebrewandbeer.com/forum/vi ... php?t=1791
Last edited by scblack on Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer." - Dave Barry.
scblack
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Saturday Jul 23, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby JaCk_SpArRoW » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:15 pm

So using say 1kg of LDME & 500g of dextrose or maltodextrin would be a good starting point?
:twisted: Ćĥĕĕŕś Ň ÃƒÅ¸ĕĕŕś :twisted:
~Ĵ@©ķ~
"Ah that's just drunk talk, sweet beautiful drunk talk" - Homer
http://blackpearlbrewingco.blogspot.com/
JaCk_SpArRoW
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wednesday Jan 04, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Canberra

Postby Aussie Claret » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:54 pm

Most definetly, just a suggestion don't use more than 500g of maltodextrine (some times referred to as corn syrup) as it can give an unusual taste in large quantities.
ac
There's nothing wrong with having nothing to say - unless you insist on saying it. (Anonymous)
Aussie Claret
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Thursday Sep 01, 2005 11:55 am
Location: Gold Coast

Postby JaCk_SpArRoW » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 1:56 pm

Aussie Claret wrote:Most definetly, just a suggestion don't use more than 500g of maltodextrine (some times referred to as corn syrup) as it can give an unusual taste in large quantities.
ac
Yet again, you came...you saw....you concurred!...cheers buddy! :lol:
:twisted: Ćĥĕĕŕś Ň ÃƒÅ¸ĕĕŕś :twisted:
~Ĵ@©ķ~
"Ah that's just drunk talk, sweet beautiful drunk talk" - Homer
http://blackpearlbrewingco.blogspot.com/
JaCk_SpArRoW
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wednesday Jan 04, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Canberra

Postby Chris » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 7:24 pm

There sure has been some activity since I left!

1kg of liquid malt would be ok with 500g of some other fermentable, but 1kg of LDM and 500g of something else will give a pretty high alco%. If this is what you are aiming for, go for it. I personally would leave out the other fermentable.

As a point of explanation, nothing that I have posted is a "rule." These are all just things that I wish someone had told me when I was very new to brewing. They are small things that I have picked up along the way, that have made huge improvements to the flavour and quality of my beer. The best idea is to use these as guidelines, and experiment to make you own "rules." Adapt these to your own tastes. I've hopefully just given you a starting point.
Chris
 
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Postby yardglass » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 8:34 pm

Chris wrote:
As a point of explanation, nothing that I have posted is a "rule." These are all just things that I wish someone had told me when I was very new to brewing.


Yeah, same...
but it was fun learning the new stuff without the backup.

cheers
yard
excuse me... your karma just ran over my dogma.

GOOD BREWS
yardglass
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sunday Oct 09, 2005 7:40 am
Location: Brewing in the Shed.

Postby Oliver » Thursday Jan 12, 2006 9:52 pm

My golden rule is don't worry. As I've said over and over, I reckon that worry has killed more homebrews than anything else.

Wort too hot when you pitched the yeast? Don't worry.

Added too much or too little of some ingredient? Don't worry.

Beer not carbonated after a couple of weeks? Don't worry.

You can worry too much. Homebrewing is an inexact science, and stuffing it up is hard. Very rarely will a beer be undrinkable or have to be tipped down the sink.

Instead of worrying, sit back, have a beer and be fairly confident your brew will be all right :wink:

Cheers,

Oliver
Oliver
Administrator
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thursday Jul 22, 2004 1:22 am
Location: West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Postby Chris » Friday Jan 13, 2006 7:55 am

That is so true Oliver.

I probably should add this as a "rule," Your beer is not infected unless it (a) makes you physically sick (b) makes even your drunk mates sick (c) has wierd purple things floating in it, and causes a and b to happen.

Do not turn beer into lawn food until it has spent at least 2-3 months in the bottle. It sometimes takes that long to develop the flavours properly.
Chris
 
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Postby dags64 » Friday Jan 13, 2006 7:59 am

Oliver wrote:My golden rule is don't worry. As I've said over and over, I reckon that worry has killed more homebrews than anything else.

Wort too hot when you pitched the yeast? Don't worry.

Added too much or too little of some ingredient? Don't worry.

Beer not carbonated after a couple of weeks? Don't worry.

You can worry too much. Homebrewing is an inexact science, and stuffing it up is hard. Very rarely will a beer be undrinkable or have to be tipped down the sink.

Instead of worrying, sit back, have a beer and be fairly confident your brew will be all right :wink:

Cheers,

Oliver


yeah, I like that "Dont worry, be happy, have a beer" :D :D

that is definitely advice that I will be taking on board, thanks
dags64
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Friday Nov 25, 2005 9:28 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills

Postby da_damage_done » Friday Jan 13, 2006 10:13 am

I was wondering should this thread be made a sticky?

Or something along the same lines

It could be honed down to give newbies a really good starting point for improving brews
da_damage_done
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Sunday Oct 23, 2005 11:54 am
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Postby The Carbonator » Friday Jan 13, 2006 10:40 am

scblack wrote:Hey, Carbonator, where are you in Baulko - I'm near the tafe?


Near Crestwood Shops. Rockley Ave.

Good to see another homebrewer in the Hills.

:P
The Brewer formerly known as Ilike'emfizzy
The Carbonator
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Tuesday Oct 18, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby flosso » Friday Jan 13, 2006 11:03 am

Just in reference to the title of this post, there are two simple things I've changed to the brewing process that have improved my homebrew no end - I think they were both mentioned in the original post but I've had success with them so thought I'd repeat them:

1) Culture a yeast from a commercial beer
2) Use malt instead of other 'sugars' as much as possble.

The first time I did this I cultured a yeast from a Coopers pale and added an extra 500g Light Malt to a Brew Enhancer 2 (which isn't 100% malt I realise).

This by far was easily my best beer to date - propbably the first one that didn't have the homebrew taste - and when I unleashed it on my mates they couldn't get enough - it disappeared pretty quickly.

I'd heartily suggest anyone that hasn't tried either of these yet to give them a go.
flosso
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Tuesday Dec 14, 2004 9:39 am
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Postby Bruiser » Friday Jan 13, 2006 12:36 pm

Hey Carbonator and scblack, I'm from Baulkham Hills as well. 3 min walk from the Tafe. There's a new brew club starting up in the Hills area. PM me if you're interested. It's a group of blokes of all different levels sharing beers and ideas.

edit: just realised no PMing on this board. Send me an email instead.
Bruiser
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thursday Oct 13, 2005 10:59 am
Location: Hornsby, NSW

Postby scblack » Friday Jan 13, 2006 2:11 pm

Bruiser wrote:Hey Carbonator and scblack, I'm from Baulkham Hills as well. 3 min walk from the Tafe. There's a new brew club starting up in the Hills area. PM me if you're interested. It's a group of blokes of all different levels sharing beers and ideas.

edit: just realised no PMing on this board. Send me an email instead.


E-mailed you - sounds good.
"Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer." - Dave Barry.
scblack
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Saturday Jul 23, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby ex0ja » Friday Mar 10, 2006 9:26 pm

I've only just seen this thread because Chris linked it in another thread. I found it very useful, perhaps it should be stickied? (Just noticed someone else said that too).

Chris wrote:1) Rack your beer!

Whatever it takes, go to your local HB shop and buy a second fermenter and some food-grade hose. It is a simple step, that will SIGNIFICANTLY improve your beers flavour and clarity


Will it really improve flavour? Or just clarity?

yardglass wrote:Experiment.
try a bit of orange peel, coriander, ginger, honey, chilli, whatever....


I'd like to try some of these things, but how do you add them to the wort? Say I wanted to add chilli for example, would I just chop up some chillis and chuck them straight into the boil?
ex0ja
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Saturday Feb 11, 2006 1:24 am

Postby Chris » Saturday Mar 11, 2006 10:48 am

Racking will improve flavour, as it ensures that the remaining fermentables actually have time to ferment.

If you don't rack, the beer sits on the yeast cake, and develops weird flavours from the yeast autolysis.

As for adding stuff to your beer...

If you add to the stovetop boil, it will have less effect on the overall beer. If you add to 2ndary, it will impart more flavour. If you add when priming, it will have the most effect.
Chris
 
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Postby NickMoore » Saturday Mar 11, 2006 12:15 pm

Chris wrote:Racking will improve flavour, as it ensures that the remaining fermentables actually have time to ferment.


bottle-conditioning serves the same purpose? more important for keggers?


Chris wrote:If you don't rack, the beer sits on the yeast cake, and develops weird flavours from the yeast autolysis.


are we too worried about this? the howtobrew.com bloke (john palmer is it?) says this has happened only once to him and that was with some boiled rice that had been left on the stovetop for weeks. and he advises leaving the beer in the fermenter for two weeks.

I can understand if you are conditioning a lager for a long time you should get it off the cake, but otherwise is it that vital?

plus the fact that racking exposes the beer to oxygen and possibly infections.
NickMoore
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Monday May 23, 2005 11:35 am

Postby Shaun » Saturday Mar 11, 2006 5:53 pm

NickMoore wrote:
Chris wrote:Racking will improve flavour, as it ensures that the remaining fermentables actually have time to ferment.


bottle-conditioning serves the same purpose? more important for keggers?


Nick if this was the case we would not have to wait for the brew to finish before bottling. If there is unfermented fermtables left in the brew when it is bottled it will contiune to ferment as well as the priming sugar fermenting giving you an over carbinated beer as the best result and beer bombs as the worst case.

Racking to allow the brew to ferment completely is important for bottle conditioned beer and keggers.

NickMoore wrote:
Chris wrote:If you don't rack, the beer sits on the yeast cake, and develops weird flavours from the yeast autolysis.


are we too worried about this? the howtobrew.com bloke (john palmer is it?) says this has happened only once to him and that was with some boiled rice that had been left on the stovetop for weeks. and he advises leaving the beer in the fermenter for two weeks.

I can understand if you are conditioning a lager for a long time you should get it off the cake, but otherwise is it that vital?

plus the fact that racking exposes the beer to oxygen and possibly infections.


We probable are overly concerned about autolysis and you can leave a brew for longer periods sitting on the yeast cake. With kit and kg brews the trub is basically yeast, however if hops or grain has been used there are other things in the trub that can give the beer weird flavours. I guess it comes down to being aware of what you have used in the brew and what effects it can have.
Shaun
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Friday Dec 03, 2004 8:48 pm
Location: Melbourne

PreviousNext

Return to Making beer

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 101 guests