Water Levels
Water Levels
When brewing kit beers - how much water do you put into the fermenter?
I used to do the standard 23ltrs, but recently have dropped it down to 21ltrs - I find that it ferments better (quicker) and the beer has a better texture
Do most people go the standard 23ltrs?
Do I get more alcohol from dropping the water level?
cheers
simonb
I used to do the standard 23ltrs, but recently have dropped it down to 21ltrs - I find that it ferments better (quicker) and the beer has a better texture
Do most people go the standard 23ltrs?
Do I get more alcohol from dropping the water level?
cheers
simonb
What's 5 American Gallons...19L? Alot of American recipes quote 5 gallons and have about the same amount of fermentables that we put in 23L. This made me start making my brews to roughly 21L (half way
.
Actually I think I may have ruined a stout on the weekend by accidently filling to 21L while on auto pilot
Should be right as the predicted OG was 1.066 for 18L and mine was 1.062 at 21L so fingers crossed.
Cheers,
Jay.

Actually I think I may have ruined a stout on the weekend by accidently filling to 21L while on auto pilot

Should be right as the predicted OG was 1.066 for 18L and mine was 1.062 at 21L so fingers crossed.
Cheers,
Jay.
Hi, I'm a newbie here. I just started my first batch ever and wouldn't you know it I went on auto-pilot and put too much water in. 5 litres extra! I was tempted to abort but a mate reckoned if I add some extra sugar it may taste a little weak but still have decent alcohol content.
The fermentor has been bubbling away for the first 3 days so there's definitely some activity.
Does anyone have any thoughts on what I might end up with?
Thanks in advance. This is a great site!
Tay
The fermentor has been bubbling away for the first 3 days so there's definitely some activity.
Does anyone have any thoughts on what I might end up with?

Thanks in advance. This is a great site!
Tay
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Thursday Jul 22, 2004 1:22 am
- Location: West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Simonb,
Yep, if you reduce the quantity of water you'll increase the amount of alcohol (by about 8.6% over what it would have been).
Tay,
I reckon your mate is right. Even though the beer will be a little on the thin side, adding some extra sugar will boost the alcohol content to a reasonable level. Try adding malt instead of sugar, as this will help the body, too, rather than just adding alcohol, making it less "watery". Perhaps 500g would be a good amount. Dissolve in boiling water, cool and add to the fermenter.
Cheers,
Oliver
Yep, if you reduce the quantity of water you'll increase the amount of alcohol (by about 8.6% over what it would have been).
Tay,
I reckon your mate is right. Even though the beer will be a little on the thin side, adding some extra sugar will boost the alcohol content to a reasonable level. Try adding malt instead of sugar, as this will help the body, too, rather than just adding alcohol, making it less "watery". Perhaps 500g would be a good amount. Dissolve in boiling water, cool and add to the fermenter.
Cheers,
Oliver
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tuesday Apr 26, 2005 9:46 am
- Location: Melbourne
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Thursday Jul 22, 2004 1:22 am
- Location: West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Bob,
Thanks for the kind words.
It's 8.6% (not 8.6 points) above what it would otherwise have been.
Here's the maths:
23 litres - 21 litres = 2 litres
2 litres / 23 litres * 100 = 8.6
So 21 litres is 8.6% less than 21 litres.
Putting that to use, say at a volume of 23 litres you got a beer than was 5.0% alcohol. By reducing the volume to 21 litres you're adding 8.6% to the original 5.0%, resulting in a beer that's 5.43% alcohol.
Maths:
5.0% * 1.086 (This is the same as multiplying by .086 and adding the original figure) = 5.43%
But maths was never one of my strong points.
Someone tell me I'm right.
Oliver
Thanks for the kind words.
It's 8.6% (not 8.6 points) above what it would otherwise have been.
Here's the maths:
23 litres - 21 litres = 2 litres
2 litres / 23 litres * 100 = 8.6
So 21 litres is 8.6% less than 21 litres.
Putting that to use, say at a volume of 23 litres you got a beer than was 5.0% alcohol. By reducing the volume to 21 litres you're adding 8.6% to the original 5.0%, resulting in a beer that's 5.43% alcohol.
Maths:
5.0% * 1.086 (This is the same as multiplying by .086 and adding the original figure) = 5.43%
But maths was never one of my strong points.
Someone tell me I'm right.
Oliver
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Thursday Apr 07, 2005 10:46 am
- Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Actually, I think Oliver switched off when maths was happening as well 
But it turns out the errors involved with his calcs are relatively insignificant, and the figure comes out to be (according to my calcs, and assuming alc production (i.e. attenuation) is unchanged in the smaller volume, a risky assumption) is approx 5.4762% for his example.
Sorry to seem so nitpicking, but I always wanted to find a use for a fairly expensive education, spread across several decades and continents
peterd

But it turns out the errors involved with his calcs are relatively insignificant, and the figure comes out to be (according to my calcs, and assuming alc production (i.e. attenuation) is unchanged in the smaller volume, a risky assumption) is approx 5.4762% for his example.
Sorry to seem so nitpicking, but I always wanted to find a use for a fairly expensive education, spread across several decades and continents

peterd
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tuesday Apr 26, 2005 9:46 am
- Location: Melbourne
Well done lads!
The guy at my homebrew shop said that the rule of thumb was a 0.5% increase in alcohol level for every litre of water reduced. So unless the unchanged attenuation assumption peterd mentioned is in fact invalid, it would seem that my HBS rule of thumb greatly over stated the change in alcohol %.
I think the actual result may lie somewhere in between the two schools of thought. HBS says 2 litres reduction leads to 1% higher alcohol; Oliver's calculations indicate about a 0.5% increase.
Regardless of any of that, reducing the water definitely leads to a fuller flavoured beer and that's what its all really about
Cheers,
the brewer
p.s. I'll admitt that i did miss read Olivers message
The guy at my homebrew shop said that the rule of thumb was a 0.5% increase in alcohol level for every litre of water reduced. So unless the unchanged attenuation assumption peterd mentioned is in fact invalid, it would seem that my HBS rule of thumb greatly over stated the change in alcohol %.
I think the actual result may lie somewhere in between the two schools of thought. HBS says 2 litres reduction leads to 1% higher alcohol; Oliver's calculations indicate about a 0.5% increase.
Regardless of any of that, reducing the water definitely leads to a fuller flavoured beer and that's what its all really about

Cheers,
the brewer
p.s. I'll admitt that i did miss read Olivers message

-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
Greg
Thats what they are doing,
It is just a very good guess, the better the guess the better the beer
I love it when Science and Art can come together
Dogger
Thats what they are doing,
It is just a very good guess, the better the guess the better the beer
I love it when Science and Art can come together
Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Thursday Apr 07, 2005 10:46 am
- Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Bob,
the HBS guy overstates the increase by a factor of about 2. That is, the increase is 0.5% (absolute, not relative) increase for a two litre decrease in water. Any effect of the attenuation issue would be to make his figures even less correct.
Of course, the effect on alcohol level of reducing water is not linear (because the measure is % by volume), but for the sort of figures we are dealing with, a 0.5% increase (decrease) for every 2 litre decrease (increase) in water level is a reasonable hueristic.
and yes, I acknowledge that I am a pedant, but higher degrees in maths and computer science seem to do that to a guy every time
peterd
the HBS guy overstates the increase by a factor of about 2. That is, the increase is 0.5% (absolute, not relative) increase for a two litre decrease in water. Any effect of the attenuation issue would be to make his figures even less correct.
Of course, the effect on alcohol level of reducing water is not linear (because the measure is % by volume), but for the sort of figures we are dealing with, a 0.5% increase (decrease) for every 2 litre decrease (increase) in water level is a reasonable hueristic.
and yes, I acknowledge that I am a pedant, but higher degrees in maths and computer science seem to do that to a guy every time

peterd
If you wanna work it out plug different volumes of water into this (http://www.brewcraft.com.au/wa.asp?idWe ... etails=120) brew calculator along with the rest of your recipe and see what happens. Maths is all done for yah.
Cheers,
Jay.
Cheers,
Jay.