Australia is one of the few if not the only country to have the market virtually controlled by two companies. it's not just the supermarkets, don't forget they own approximately 85% of the liquor outlets as well.blandy wrote:Last year I was at a guest lecture by someone from the ACCC. He had a few things to say about Coles Vs Safeway/Woolorths: (no direct quotes, just what I remember)wildschwein wrote:That reasoning may have a kernel of truth to it. But it only holds if there is only one supermarket chain. As far as I know there are at least two big chains and a group of independents which are competing with one another. Unless you are suggesting there is some type of cartel and price fixing arrangement in place.
- They each have a much greater share of the Australian market than Wal-Mart has in the US![]()
![]()
- If they chose to, they have the market power to collude and force others out of business, then make huge profits.
- EXEPT, Australian competition laws won't let them, and they seem hell bent on competing with each other.
As for the for the competition laws , Pfft! They don't mean a thing with our current government (oops sorry don't mean to talk politics).
I buy my kits and caps at the supermarket when they are cheap. Eveything else I buy at the HBS either because they are cheaper (malt) or I can't get them anywhere else (hops/ grains).As for stocking HB stuff, my supermarket's got a fair range of kits, but I'd never go there. More often than not I'll drive or take the train to Grain and Grape. Supermarkets will never be able to compete profitably with homebrew shops on anything other than price. Price alone (within reason) will not stop people like me travelling to the other side of Melbourne for some good advice.
No grains at my supermarket either.