Spelling & grammar I hope!!!!




They've let one of 'em out.goatsby wrote:Well here are the details greg The brisbane Lesbian Vampire Murder
took place in Australia in 1991 in the case of Tracey Wigginton. In October 1989 Wigginton, her lover Lisa Ptaschinski and two female friends Kim Jervis and Tracey Waugh lured Edward Baldock into a local park with the promise of sexual favours. Instead Wigginton stabbed him so many times that he was virtually decapitated. During their trial the three other women claimed that Wigginton was a vampire and craved a large 'feed' for human blood. Despite a more logical diagnosis of Multiple Personality Disorder by two prison psychiatrists during the 14 months before her trial, the media tapped into society's fears of the supernatural and went to town with 'lesbian vampire' headlines. A Mental Health Tribunal rejected the MPD diagnosis and Wigginton was deemed fit to stand trial. She pleaded guilty and to this date is serving a life sentence in Queensland
Edward Baldock was enjoying a Friday night at the Caledonian Club having a few drinks, then picked up and killed by lesbian vampire killers.
Not a nice way to go.
As usual people in Brisbane tried to hush it up, but it was a big story in southern states.
On a personal note i thought Kim Jervis was rather attractive, I was going to write to her in prison offering to cure her lesbianism.
Very keen to hear why, after centuries of recorded weather observation by Man, records only show this "natural" pattern occurring since Industrialisation.bullfrog wrote:The increase in global temperature is nothing that hasn't been seen on Earth before many, many times. Just because humans haven't been there to experience the last few times that our planet's meteorology went through this cycle doesn't mean that it hasn't happened before, that it isn't natural, nor that we or our coal-burning ways are the cause.
Very keen to hear the source of that assertion.Bum wrote:Very keen to hear why, after centuries of recorded weather observation by Man, records only show this "natural" pattern occurring since Industrialisation.bullfrog wrote:The increase in global temperature is nothing that hasn't been seen on Earth before many, many times. Just because humans haven't been there to experience the last few times that our planet's meteorology went through this cycle doesn't mean that it hasn't happened before, that it isn't natural, nor that we or our coal-burning ways are the cause.
Of course. I've nothing but respect for Bum, and know that he, like me, likes a good debate.Oliver wrote:Make sure you keep this discussion nice, chaps
Cheers,
Oliver
Damn Right he does. Al gore is nothing more than an egotistical crusader who wants his name up in lights. He's tried that crap before, only with less spectacular results.bullfrog wrote: Al Gore certainly knows how to spin a line to earn a buck, and it's you and I that are paying it.
It's interesting that you would link to New Scientist. I'll admit that a lot of what has built my understanding of the debate has been gleaned from that publication over the years (my wife has a subscription and also is currently studying archaeology and paleoanthropology (after getting bored of law) so a lot has also come from her textbooks.)lob wrote:This is one of the most comprehensive articles on climate change:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... lexed.html
Bit of late night reading for the willing skeptic
Yes, this is true - but it should be noted that everyone who has a benefit in taking such a position stopped spinning that garbage years ago (ie. fossil fuel industry, governments). It is just the Andrew Bolts of this world who cling to it.bullfrog wrote:Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, some just find it convenient to spin it that way.
So now the argument is based on the PR departments of vast multinational corporations swinging their companies to follow the popular view-point? Nobody wants to see the planet fall to bits, so why take a stance that could cause people to say that that's what your goal is?Bum wrote:Yes, this is true - but it should be noted that everyone who has a benefit in taking such a position stopped spinning that garbage years ago (ie. fossil fuel industry, governments). It is just the Andrew Bolts of this world who cling to it.bullfrog wrote:Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, some just find it convenient to spin it that way.
I'm up at @ 4.30am every morning and refuse to wear jeans or jumper from October onwards, it's just not australian. I'd rather be cold for an hour or so.bullfrog wrote: Jumpers in Summer and we're getting a bloody carbon tax! How friggen cold do Julia Gillard and Bob Brown want the place to be?