High Alcohol % from SG/FG, why am I sober?
High Alcohol % from SG/FG, why am I sober?
I was also wondering if anyone has every experienced their alcohol percentage seemingly being way off the calculations?
The Blackrock cider I brewed up recently had SG=1064 FG=1012 giving an approx. 7% alc. And yet when I drink it, I find that I can drink two (740ml) bottles and have no more effect than say drinking a stubby of heavy beer, when it should be more like drinking two bottles of wine.
The feeling of drunkenness is entirely subjective of course, but I find a commercial brew of what should be comparable alc% has more of a "kick" than this cider.
Even my previous beer brew, which should have been the equivalent of a heavy beer, did not booze me up to the same degree.
I am sure my hydrometer readings were correct, but even allowing for a large margin of error I would still be coming up with at least 6% alc or so. Any suggestions?
The Blackrock cider I brewed up recently had SG=1064 FG=1012 giving an approx. 7% alc. And yet when I drink it, I find that I can drink two (740ml) bottles and have no more effect than say drinking a stubby of heavy beer, when it should be more like drinking two bottles of wine.
The feeling of drunkenness is entirely subjective of course, but I find a commercial brew of what should be comparable alc% has more of a "kick" than this cider.
Even my previous beer brew, which should have been the equivalent of a heavy beer, did not booze me up to the same degree.
I am sure my hydrometer readings were correct, but even allowing for a large margin of error I would still be coming up with at least 6% alc or so. Any suggestions?
Last edited by JeffHool on Thursday Apr 14, 2005 10:00 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wednesday Mar 23, 2005 10:34 am
- Location: Bombay, NSW
If you were following that recipe Jeff, and making around 20 litres, I don't think it would be coming out at 7%. It's basically a can and a kilo, which usually equates to about 5%. Unless the Blackrock Cider kit gives a higher OG than a beer kit.
Just a guess. I could be wrong. It has happened once.
...saying that, I too have experienced the unusually unintoxicating homebrew.
Just a guess. I could be wrong. It has happened once.
...saying that, I too have experienced the unusually unintoxicating homebrew.
Evo - Part Man, Part Ale
Sometime if you collect first drop from tap you get a "sugar" build up where it has collected in sediment trap. I always let first 50ml go to clear this build up!
Some people say I have a drinking Problem....
I drink, I get drunk, I fall over....
What's the problem?
http://www.brodiescastlebrewing.com/
I drink, I get drunk, I fall over....
What's the problem?
http://www.brodiescastlebrewing.com/
I just had the same problems on my last batch (Cooper's Lager w/BE1). Initial reading of 1.050, but didn't think about it until later, when I realised I must have had high fermentables concentration sitting in the sediment reducer. Interesting enough though, it stopped fermenting at 1.017 (stable over 48h, at about 24-25C), which gives it 4.9% - about what I'd expect. I'm a little perplexed, given that these are temperature-corrected readings, and I've tested the hydrometer in plain water - 1.000.
Ah well - I'll taste it a week and a half and see how it is.
Regards,
Tony
Ah well - I'll taste it a week and a half and see how it is.
Regards,
Tony
I think this must be the explanation. I thought the SG might have been so high simply because it was a cider, and due to the extra juice I added.grabman wrote:Sometime if you collect first drop from tap you get a "sugar" build up where it has collected in sediment trap. I always let first 50ml go to clear this build up!
If I recall it was the first drop out of the tap that went into the gravity reading.
Oh well.... maybe I'll use 3kg dextrose next Cider!
When mixing a kit+kilo brew I have taken a reading from drawing off a glass from the tap and testing that, then dropping the hydrometer in the top of the mix. Sometimes the variation can be as much as 10. So I take that as a sign to stir it up a bit more.
I also tend to agree that alcohol+preservatives in commercial beer affect us more than the alcohol alone in our brews.
Anyone from Qld remember when Bernie Power started out on his own? I could drink that stuff full strength till the cows came home and not feel bad at all. As soon as CUB took over it went the way of normal commercial brews.
I also tend to agree that alcohol+preservatives in commercial beer affect us more than the alcohol alone in our brews.
Anyone from Qld remember when Bernie Power started out on his own? I could drink that stuff full strength till the cows came home and not feel bad at all. As soon as CUB took over it went the way of normal commercial brews.

Clint
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
Pelican,
I have found that it isn't that imprtant. The stirring allows you to incorporate the oxygen required to get the yeast through its lag phase. The sugars will eventually disperse to be uniform (diffusion)
Dogger
I have found that it isn't that imprtant. The stirring allows you to incorporate the oxygen required to get the yeast through its lag phase. The sugars will eventually disperse to be uniform (diffusion)
Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette