General homebrew discussion, tips and help on kit and malt extract brewing, and talk about equipment. Queries on sourcing supplies and equipment should go in The Store.
sam
Posts: 29 Joined: Monday Oct 30, 2006 10:13 am
Post
by sam » Sunday Dec 03, 2006 8:18 am
Sorry guys, just a quick question on racking. i have researched it a bit on different internet sites, incluiding this one, but when you rack the beer, do you have to leave it in the second fermenter for anyamount of time?? or once it is in there, can you bulk prime it and bottle it.
cheers, Sam.
mikey
Posts: 223 Joined: Saturday Oct 15, 2005 11:35 am
Post
by mikey » Sunday Dec 03, 2006 8:57 am
Leave it for one to two weeks. One purpose of racking is to eliminate most of the floaties.
You need to let it sit after racking so everything that came trough from the primary fermenter settles to the bottom and you get a clearer beer.
Racking and then bottling straight away will leave you probably leave you with a beer ful of yeast and sediment.
The other purpose of racking is to help age the beer more quickly by letting it sit unfermented in secondary.
BierMeister
Posts: 255 Joined: Tuesday Jun 13, 2006 1:53 pm
Location: Adelaide
Post
by BierMeister » Sunday Dec 03, 2006 8:14 pm
You can rack and then bulk prime straight up. I would just leave it in the primary for two to three weeks first to settle and condition if you do. I personally rack to a secondary after one or two in primary and wait two to three, but its a personal choice and others do different. Most common seems to be 7 days primary and 7 days secondary and then bulk prime.
Sounds like Beer O'clock.
Chris
Posts: 3716 Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra
Post
by Chris » Thursday Dec 07, 2006 11:01 am
What does "con sar it" mean???
ryan
Posts: 1177 Joined: Friday Oct 06, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Brisbane
Post
by ryan » Friday Dec 08, 2006 1:52 pm
Chris wrote: What does "con sar it" mean???
It doesn`t mean anything- he said "con sarn it".
timmy
Posts: 837 Joined: Saturday Sep 09, 2006 11:34 pm
Location: SE Melbourne
Post
by timmy » Friday Dec 08, 2006 2:49 pm
I believe it's grizzled 1830's prospector language.
(It's an obscure Simpsons reference)
Pale_Ale
Posts: 1233 Joined: Wednesday Oct 25, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Post
by Pale_Ale » Friday Dec 08, 2006 2:54 pm
I believe it is used to express frustration i.e God damn it
Coopers.
drsmurto
Posts: 3300 Joined: Friday Nov 17, 2006 11:53 am
Location: Adelaide Hills
Post
by drsmurto » Friday Dec 08, 2006 3:00 pm
could easily replace with dag nab it!
Gotta love the simpsons refs!
Chris
Posts: 3716 Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra
Post
by Chris » Monday Dec 11, 2006 9:22 am
I already knew what 'con sarn it' meant, I just wanted to know what 'con sar it' meant. Anyone?
N.C.
Posts: 52 Joined: Tuesday Oct 31, 2006 9:48 am
Location: Wyong, N.S.W.
Post
by N.C. » Monday Dec 11, 2006 9:32 am
you'll find the term "consarn it" in frequent use in old donald duck comics, particularly where uncle scrooge is involved...
Chris
Posts: 3716 Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra
Post
by Chris » Monday Dec 11, 2006 9:34 am
The things you learn when making beer...
ryan
Posts: 1177 Joined: Friday Oct 06, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Brisbane
Post
by ryan » Monday Dec 11, 2006 12:20 pm
Chris wrote: I already knew what 'con sarn it' meant, I just wanted to know what 'con sar it' meant. Anyone?
yes of course you already knew.
Chris
Posts: 3716 Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra
Post
by Chris » Tuesday Dec 12, 2006 9:37 am
No really...
Well I did AFTER I was told.